彼與之爭辯、僅為其敬鬼神之事、又為已死者名耶穌、保羅言其生也、為此而訟之、

不过是有几样辩论，为他们自己敬鬼神的事，又为一个人名叫耶稣，是已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过，有几样辩论是有关他们自己敬鬼神的事，以及一个名叫耶稣的人，他已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过，有几样辩论是有关他们自己敬鬼神的事，以及一个名叫耶稣的人，他已经死了，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过是关于他们的宗教和一个叫耶稣的人的一些争论。耶稣已经死了，保罗却说他仍然活着。

他们与他争辩的，只是他们的宗教问题；还论到一位已经死了的耶稣，保罗却说他是活着的。

不过他们与他有一些争议的问题，是关于自己宗教的事，以及关于一个叫耶稣的人——这个人已经死了，保罗却声称他还活着。

不過是有幾樣辯論，為他們自己敬鬼神的事，又為一個人名叫耶穌，是已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過，有幾樣辯論是有關他們自己敬鬼神的事，以及一個名叫耶穌的人，他已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過，有幾樣辯論是有關他們自己敬鬼神的事，以及一個名叫耶穌的人，他已經死了，保羅卻說他是活着的。

不過是關於他們的宗教和一個叫耶穌的人的一些爭論。耶穌已經死了，保羅卻說他仍然活著。

他們與他爭辯的，只是他們的宗教問題；還論到一位已經死了的耶穌，保羅卻說他是活著的。

不過告他一些關於他們自己敬鬼神之事的問題。又是關於一個已經死了、保羅還指說是活着的耶穌。

不過他們與他有一些爭議的問題，是關於自己宗教的事，以及關於一個叫耶穌的人——這個人已經死了，保羅卻聲稱他還活著。

惟攻之以關乎敬鬼神之道、與一已死之人名耶穌者、而保羅言其生也、

惟論其畏鬼神事、又論已死之耶穌、保羅言其生、為此而訟之、

僅為宗教上之爭執、實非予所逆料也。不過葆樂肯定有一耶穌、死而復生而已。

Instead, they had some points of dispute with him about their own religion and about a dead man named Jesus who Paul claimed was alive.

Instead, they argued with him about their own beliefs. They didn’t agree about a man named Jesus. They said Jesus was dead, but Paul claimed Jesus was alive.

Rather they had certain points of dispute with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, who was dead, but whom Paul asserted to be alive.

Instead, it was something about their religion and a dead man named Jesus, who Paul insists is alive.

Instead they had some disagreements with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, a dead man Paul claimed to be alive.

but they simply had some points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a dead man, Jesus, whom Paul asserted to be alive.

but had some questions against him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, who had died, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

but had certain questions against him of their own religion, and of one Jesus, who was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

Instead they had some disagreements with him about their own religion and about a certain Jesus, a dead man Paul claimed to be alive.

But had certain questions against him of their own superstition, and of one Jesus, which was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

Rather they had several points of disagreement with him about their own religion and about a man named Jesus who was dead, whom Paul claimed to be alive.

but had certain questions against him about their own religion, and about one Jesus, who was dead, whom Paul affirmed to be alive.

若辯論言詞名號及爾律法、爾曹自理之、若此之事、我不審判、

見所訟者、祗為辯論其律法、非為當死當繫之故、

若基督未復活、則我之傳徒然、爾之信亦徒然、若死者不復活、則天主未使基督復活、而我儕證天主曾使之復活、是我儕為天主妄證矣、死者不復活、則基督亦未復活、若基督未復活、則爾之信徒然、爾仍在罪中、且信基督而死者、亦皆滅亡、我儕信基督、若惟在今生有望、則於眾人之中、我儕最苦、但基督誠復活、在寢者中為首起者、

蓋天主已定一日、欲藉所立之人、按公義審判天下、且使其由死復活、而賜萬民以可信之證、○

自約翰施洗、至其別我升天之日、有常與我偕者、必由其中選一人、可與我儕同證耶穌復活、

然我蒙天主祐、至今猶存、在尊者卑者前作證、所言無非諸先知及摩西預言、將來必有之事、即基督當受害、首先由死復活、為光以照斯民及異邦人、○

至以弗所、留二人於彼、而自入會堂、與猶太人辯論、

保羅立於亞畧巴古中曰、雅典人、我見爾曹、凡事敬鬼神甚矣、我適遊行、欲觀爾所崇拜者、遇一祭壇、上刻曰、未識之主、爾所未識而崇拜者、今我告爾、

昔我以所受者授爾、其最要者、即基督為我儕之罪而死、應經所載、且葬、至第三日復活、亦應經所載、

我乃生者、雖死仍生、至於世世、阿們、且執哈底哈底有譯陰間有譯地獄與死亡之鑰、

此耶穌、天主已使之復活、我皆為之作證、

保羅既至、自耶路撒冷來之猶太人環立、以諸重罪訟之、而不得其據、